Running head: ANALYSIS OF A MEDIA SOURCEâS COVERAGE ON A RESEARCH Analysis of a Media springâs Coverage on a Research Study The circumvent Street ledger published an article regarding a juvenile psychopharmacology field on depression done by Dr. hunter that investigated whether pre-medication brain activity corresponded with treatment outcome. In addition, the article discusses the raise results garnered from the placebo group v. medicated group analysis. While the news piece does a fair job in representing the studyâs findings, the writer does delve into extrapolations not statistically supported in the veritable study. Fifty-one adults who were diagnosed with major depression were used in the study, and this was accurately reported by the news article (Wang, 2006). Hunter et al. investigated whether on that point were significant differences in âdemographic characteristics, sickness history, baseline illness severity, [and] final response[s],â and finding none, pooled the subjects for analysis (2006, p. 1427). This does give the Journal, who must digest the findings for the public, good reason to fail in reporting this. The study is experimental in nature, also using double-blind and randomized appellation to help rid the results of confounding variable input.
All of the subjects were disposed a placebo anti-depressant for a one-week lead-in; after this, half of the individuals were keep on the placebo while the others were given one of two anti-depressants. Electroencephalograph (EEG) readings were taken at the time of enrollment, after the lead-in period, and several quantify later (over an eight week period). The Wall Street Journal condenses this explanation down, and while the article abandons the jargon of an experimenter, it does give the pictorial matter of an experimental method being followed. When the news article explains how the researchers delineate their variables they leave out valuable information. The author states that patients with...
All of the subjects were disposed a placebo anti-depressant for a one-week lead-in; after this, half of the individuals were keep on the placebo while the others were given one of two anti-depressants. Electroencephalograph (EEG) readings were taken at the time of enrollment, after the lead-in period, and several quantify later (over an eight week period). The Wall Street Journal condenses this explanation down, and while the article abandons the jargon of an experimenter, it does give the pictorial matter of an experimental method being followed. When the news article explains how the researchers delineate their variables they leave out valuable information. The author states that patients with...
Is this the in force(p) essay for you?
or
If you want to get a secure essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment