After receiving my assignment back, I realized from the comments that the grammatical construction of my commentary was entirely wrong. I did non follow the prim structure but preferably wrote it the way I allow been writing it since secondary school. My introduction did not address the vitrine matter of the prose. It also did not mention how the writer has do the subject matter known to readers. In fact I realized that my introduction was too long but it did not have what was necessary in an introduction. I should have also included the purpose of the setting, as it was relevant in this prose.
The consistency of my commentary was flawed at most parts. At the boodle of each paragraph, I did not include a number sentence and as a result, each paragraph did not stick to one point but rather I kept jumping around from point to point. Hence, the structure was incorrect. I also made too many generalization statements, which is unnecessary. From the comments, I realized that I had used the wrong records on several occasions.
I could have paid more solicitude on this aspect by making sure that the word was appropriate where used.
There were two major worrys in my commentary, which I realized have been the main issue since secondary school. I tend to beat around the bush instead of deprivation straight to the point. This makes the commentary really long with many outcaste and useless sentences. I should not summarize the prose but instead mention my point straight away. The other big problem with my commentary is that I do not give an in depth analysis. I always just analyze the prose very superficially. When I mentioned my point and give evidence from the passage, I did not go on to...If you want to get a intact essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment