Loftus and Palmer (1974) were interested in the accuracy of memory after witnessing a car accident, in particular to see if leading questions distorted the accuracy of an eyewitnesss immediate recall. Forty-five students were shown seven films of different relations accidents. After each film the participants were granted a questionnaire which asked them to suck up the accident and then answer a series of particular(prenominal) questions about it. There was one critical. This question was About how tight were the cars going when they hit each other? One meeting of participants were given this question. The other five groups were given the verbs smashed, collided, bumped or contacted in brand of the word hit.
The mean speed estimate was deliberate for each group. The group given the word smashed estimated a higher speed than the other groups (about 41 mph).
The group given the word contacted estimated the lowest speed (about 30 mph)
Loftus research suggested that EWT was primarily inaccurate and therefore unreliable, but not all researchers determine with this conclusion. Yuille and Cutshall (1986) interviewed 13 people who had witnessed an armed robbery in Canada. The interviews took place more than 4 months after the crime and included ii misleading questions. Despite these questions the witnesses provided accurate recall that matched their initial flesh out reports. This suggests that post-event information may not affect memory in real-life EWT.
The study by Loftus and Palmer indicates that the form of questioning can provoke a significant effect on a witnesss answer to the question. It is possible that such post-event...If you want to occupy a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment