Qualitative Vs. quantifiable
In class, we have covered ii chief(prenominal) approaches in canvas communications. One was the Qualitative method, which undertook various measures in qualitative information; that is to say, words and not numbers. The other method was the decimal method, which favors quantitative data as superior. Some questioners prefer to choose a method, and practice that method for the rest of their careers. Others like to switch among methods, or even combine methods and execute their research as such. I will choose a method of research and argue why it is superior to the other. I will tape that the Quantitative method is superior to the qualitative.
In the Quantitative method, researchers gather numeral data and use that as their proving grounds. Quantitative researchers create better relationships between the items being studied. It utilizes the scientific method in formulating theorems. The Quantitative method also answers the triad metatheoretical questions of: ontology, epistemology, and axiology. Those are the three main questions that are answered when conducting any theoretical experiments. And those questions are all answered when utilizing the Quantitative method. In order to explain how the quantitative method accurately deduces theorems, we must first know what questions are asked. Using the three ones as stated serves as a base. Questions of ontology probe what is significant and what isnt. Epistemogical questions how do we know and what is knowledge? And finally, the axiological aspect questions what dimension do personal values have in research.
In epistemology, on that point can be two basic positions that can be taken. One is the objectivist, that is, believe that it is possible to explain the world because in that location is some truth out there, and we just have to show it. The other position, subjectivist, states that the truth that I dont personally experience doesnt outlast; that...
--
References
-->This is a reasonable introduction to evaluating the pros and cons of qualitative and quantitative methods. The wholly two things I would say, are that firstly there is more much more which could be said about the two methods (this essay only really scratches the surface) and that secodnly, perhaps the author should come to an end from trying to conclude that one method is better than the other. twain have their applications, and both can be very efficacious if used properly - one is not better than the other.
Well done. It assisted me with a bit of sociology I was trying to study. You could also mention the position that questionnaires are used to conduct quantitative research.It is a methodological analysis that is usually used my Positivists like Auguste Comte.Qualitative employs the use of participant observance and is usually used by Symbolic Interactionists like max Weber.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment