The Mahabarata A

RESPONSE TO THE MAHABHARATA Considering that heaven is a determine where supposedly no enmities are allowed, it is very surprising that even in this place the most righteous man among the Pancalas, Yudhisthira, refuses to see Duryodhana. Although one qualification expect a sage such as Narada to resist this behavior considering the holiness of heaven, the wise sage consents the king of Pancalas to rent this attitude. This led me to think about how ambiguous ones view of what is defame or right can be. Thus, as Indra, the supreme god, told Yudhisthira in that respect is some safe and bad in all things (Narasimhan 213).

Furthermore, the Mahabharata presents a society in which traditions are followed strictly. However, the idea of relative wide and evil exposed by Indra does not reflect the libertine way of thinking of this culture. Thus, if there is always some good and bad in all things it should be hard to taste somebodys actions. Nevertheless, heroes were punished when they did not follow the their code of honor. At the comparable time, punishments and rewards should not exist if an action has some positive and contradict sides.



However, throughout this book we bewilder encounter several events in which sages have either cursed or attributed a blessing to people based on the their behavior.

I strongly represent with the Sage Indra and his perspective about things. Nevertheless, I think that we have been raised thinking the opposite. Thus, instead of trying to understand other(a) people, we become their judges. It is very hard to omit our own horizon about others because as humans we only see on others what we want to see.

If you want to get a full essay, gear up it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper