The title is Coney Island: The Prozac of the Early 20th Century. .

Immigrants, factory accomplishmenters, and middle to upper yr citizens a equivalent, needed breaks from the burdens of their passing(a) lives. The immigrants and factory workers needed a recess from their strenuous jobs and destitution-stricken lives, while the better off individuals needed a pass from the demands of the structures of society. rabbit Island became this cosmopolitan Prozac by which people could barricade their troubles in the intense sensations of the moment. (Kasson, 81) cony Island began in 1829, as a untainted sea posture seclusion for wealthy people. It had the usual utilities, such(prenominal) as restaurants, saloons, and veritable(a) a steamboat (Kasson, 29), and the added rougher element made it the starting time of a perfectly normal getaway. However, as time passed on, it would perform wholeness of the most memorable recreation parks in history.

The first thing worth noticing is that it was called an entertainment park, not bonnie a park, or an exposition. In contrast to the colour metropolis and Central Park, rock hyrax sought frankly to entertain or else than to uplift (Kasson, 27). This methodology appears to have worked: Frederick Olmsted, a man implemental in developing Central Park, was quoted as saying the chase about the White City. Expression of the crowd too agate line like, common, dull, anxious, and c be-worn (Kasson, 23). Conversely, lower class citizens and immigrants, who could not afford anything at dassie Island, still came to the park, merely for the joy of mixing, the sense of universe, and the good humor that was always present in the standard atmosphere (Kasson, 39).

For immigrants and factory workers, the amusement park was an escape from the loneliness, separation from the association, and despair they felt as a result of their poverty (Industrialization, 85). They felt a sense of degradation that mouse hare could double back (Industrialization, 85). hyrax Island let people forget the outside public and condensed all the social classes into one class by providing diametrical forms of entertainments that could reach out to all varieties of people and different cultures (Kasson, 39-40).

This commixture included the upper class citizens. For them, the amusement park tried and true accustomed social roles, and mocked established social fellowship (Kasson, 50). By doing so, it freed them from the shackles of the structured society, and the naughtiness of violating customary proprieties (Kasson, 47) and succumbing to those violent, dangerous pleasures (Kasson, 88) fascinated them. In the outside industrial world, the members of the middle and upper class were infallible to behave a certain way, wear specific kinds of clothes, and work in a certain job field. Coney Island was a different dream world where all is bizarre and uncivilised and gayer and more different from the every-day world (Kasson, 69). It was completely free from the laws of society, and allowed even the wealthier citizens, in sum to anyone else who visited, to be free for a day, or however long they chose to stay at Coney Island.

However, this universal Prozac was bound to have some side effects. Coney Island was a magnet for gamblers, whores, and con men (Kasson, 29). In addition to harboring these unpleasantries, the amusement park contributed to a gradual rise in tolerance of lewdness. Postcards, photographs, and even rides captured this increasing permissiveness. There was even one ride called the Cannon Coaster that advertised with Will she throw her armor around your neck and yell? Well, I guess yes (Kasson, 43).

more of the critics played out these downsides in their arguments against the amusement park. Yet, these critics were rich ministers, educators, and reformers who became the leadership of the refined culture (Kasson, 4). Being wealthier than their neighbors were, the rich believed themselves to be the mere trustee and agent for [their] shorter brethren (Industrialization, 77). Thus, a world where the immigrants and lower class citizens could escape from the wisdom and overflowing knowledge of their superiors was an outrage. Some whitethorn have had altruistic motives, but the majority probably did not. They argued that Coney Island promoted promiscuity, lesser morals, and that it was not civil. An alternative to this mindless foolishness was the White City or Central Park. It was reported that once in Central Park, rude, noisy fellows, as they entered the park, became hushed, moderate, and careful (Kasson, 15). There, the ambience was pick up and one could be social, have fun, and still be dependent to the rules that the wealthy thought to be suitable.

Regardless of their wishes, millions of people go along to crowd into Coney Island until the late 1910s and early 1920s when fires destroyed the amusement parks, and the owners either died, retired, or became bankrupt and out of business (Kasson, 111-112). As to a further explanation for the decline in attending to the amusement parks, one man says, The radio and movies killed it. The movies killed put-ons, (Kasson, 112). To elaborate on that, the adaptation phenomenon was taking place, just as in Adele Lindners state of affairs: as she got used to the Hellman home, she began to see the dark side. Just so, as the culture caught up to the now less daring Coney Island, the people got bored with it. Just like that, the untamed illusion of Coney Island came to an end.

Coney Island was the Prozac for the various citizens of New York and like all medicines, had obvious side effects. The constant question was whether these side effects were acceptable or if they outweighed the advantages. I believe that Coney Island was the best possible solution for the dilemma that befell the victims of industrialization. It was an alternative for the poor to drinking the money out of their pockets like Jurgis in Oscar Handlins The jungle (Industrialization, 80). It mesmerized the uptight, tense middle and upper class members with its fantastic sculptured animals (Kasson, 65) and enchanted garden (Kasson, 66) lit by a quarter million lights.

Of course, a healthy balance was required between this vacation from the orderly life; the determining factors, however, are too various. Thus, this decision depends on the relative individual. An example of a good balance is Adeles coffeehouse, in which people could go over unadulterated music on the piano and talk amongst themselves freely, in a warm environment away from the worries of work; she combined the factors of the genteel culture and the new tolerant culture. The same predicament follows us today, where the difference between the classes still increases, and we can find Coney Islands scattered throughout our environments such as modern amusement parks, or even different gadgets, like the television or the iPod. Every generation has its Coney Island and we all must, in turn, learn how not to overdose.

Bibliography:-John F. Kasson. Amusing the Million: Coney Island at the twisting of the Century-Bert Altena. De-Industrialization : Social,Cultural, and Political Aspects

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper