The Future of Freedom Essay -- essays research papers fc

HistoryThe in store(predicate) of FreedomIn his book, The Future of Freedom, Fareed Zakaria writes that we must make democracy safe for the world. The American democracy sets the archetype around the world for liberal democracies, but transitions across for other countries across the world toward a liberal democracy is often difficult and with suffering decision making, close to impossible. Liberal democracies are the dodges in which people ask their government and live in an environment of freedom. In Zakarias book, he warns the readers of several telltale signs that their process toward a liberal democracy is in trouble. He uses examples of different countries doing it right and doing it wrong- the ones discussed in this essay get out be Russia and China.After the communist collapse in Russia, Zakaria writes that Russia concentrated likewise practically on a quick fix. The attracters wanted to mimic the American democracy an conveyd free and fair elections, but they for got about make believeing a persistent economy. Robert Kaplan writes in his essay, Was Democracy Just a Moment? that countries need to establish a stable economic carcass before they try to institute a political system or else that political system allow for fail. Specifically, Kaplan thinks that there should be a strong and large shopping centre course in the nation before it leaders think democracy leave field. Kaplan was not the only intellectual to say this Aristotle believed that a strong middle class bred a strong society. The idea about this is that democracy cannot work if the majority of a country is poor and starving while a small minority has all the money. The poor will be too preoccupied with trying to survive than maintaining the government. Russia relied too much on its intrinsic resources instead of trying to build a functioning economy (Zakaria, 92). Zakaria writes, Russias fundamental problem is not that it is a poor country struggle to educate, but rath er that it is a rich country struggling to modernize (92). By making the mistake of first fixing the political system before the economy, and then mismanaging its resources, Russias political system fell feed to corruption. Zakaria writes, Yeltsin did little to build institutions in Russia. In fact he hurt almost all competing centers of power-the legislature, the courts, regional governors (93). ... ...e his blessing for open economic markets (Zakaria, 83). That leads us to the present time.With examples like Singapore, China hopes to maintain its current situation. Zakaria writes, Their role fabric is former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew of Singapore. Lee achieved the dream of either strongmen to modernize the economy, even the society, of his country, but not the politics (85). Ironically, Zakaria feels Chinese officials should fade to the teachings of Karl Marx for help. He writes, Marx understood that when a country modernizes its economy, embraces capitalism, and creates a bourgeoisie, the political system will change to reflect that transformation (Zakaria, 87). Zakaria holds hope that the leaders will come around and accept the inevitability of China eventually get a liberal democracy. All of those involved, realize that that process will be a long and strenuous one because hardly any leader ever gives up his power willingly.Works CitedKaplan, Robert D. Was Democracy Just a Moment? The Atlantic Monthly. Boston December, 1997.Zakaria, Fareed. The Future of Freedom. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. New York, 2004.