The Government Should Make Use Of Revenue Sharing :: essays research papers

The G all overnment Should Make social function of Revenue SharingFederal grants have become more joint over the last 60 years, ascribable to theexpansion and retraction of the coat of the federal governing body. The federalgovernment began expanding in the 1930s to deal with the Depression. It white plaguefederal agencies to directly deal with problems. As time went on, the taskswere turned over to the states, but the federal government still remainedinvolved through the use of federal grants to states and localities. In the1970s, Nixons New Federalism commit a heavy strain on federal grants. Revenuesharing gave federal dollars to localities and states that had never accreditedvery much or any federal money before. This change magnitude local interest inreceiving federal money in umpteen localities.In order to deal with the federal bureaucracy and receive federal money,localities and states have to develop efficient and effective bureaucracies oftheir own. These state and local bureaucracies must(prenominal) understand the federalrules and requirements for receiving federal aid. Some states routinelyreceive a greater core of federal money than otherwise states with similarpopulations due to the differences in state bureaucracies. The state which hasan effective grant-writing bureaucracy and maintains relations with federalbureaucrats and leaders is often able to get more money.Federal bureaucracies argon often very regionalized. They are staffed by peoplefrom a genuine region, and they primarily deal with people from that region.They give more federal tending to these regions too. The overall trend infederal spending in a state may be different from a particular agencys image of spending. Some states may get very little overall federal funding,but may get much more than the average amount of money from a certain federalagencys grants.Ameri toilet state-level politics can be divided up into 3 categories traditional,moralistic, and single(a) istic. Traditional areas are heavily elitist, andsocial elites are the primary leaders of society. They have less faith ongovernment programs, government spending, and government in general. They arenot as democratic as in other areas of the country. Moralistic cultures put aheavy focus on government taking an active agent role in society. There is moreemphasis on democratic methods in government, government funding, governmentprograms, and the provision of services. The individualist culture seesgovernment as only being important when it can help the individual succeed. Itshould never hamper the individual from attaining personnel success. The Southis considered more traditionalist. The midatlantic states and other areaswhich have descendants of the original settlers of the midatlantic states areconsidered individualistic. The northern states are moralistic. both of these