A few of the difficulties with private prisons can also be attributed to other problems including inexperienced staff. In the prison opened by CCA at Youngstown, correctional officers stated that they did not have sufficient training and experience to cope on the inmate population. The Youngstown situation was exacerbated by the simple fact how the CCA violated its deal with local officials by shipping in over 600 maximum-security prisoners, even though the facility was designated for medium-security prisoners only. Even far more significantly, the poor quality on the staff at personal prisons can be reflected in numerous lawsuits against CCA corrections officers for physically abusing inmates (Phinney, 1998b, pp. 1-3).
Furthermore, researchers analyzing the billion-dollar private industry have also observed that personal organizations have failed to deliver their promise of providing cost-efficient services. Based on Mattera, Khan, LeRoy and Davis (2001), nearly 75 percent from the big individual prisons during the U.S. have received at least a single type of federal, nation or local economic development subsidy. In addition, practically 40 percent with the facilities have also benefited from low-cost construction financing through tax-free bonds or debt security provided by the government.
The above discussion has shown how the use of personalized prisons has each rewards and disadvantages. While some personalized companies have relied on government subsidies to construct their prisons, many business were able to build prisons at low costs and manage them cost-effectively. Thus, they have contributed to the crime prevention effort by alleviating the pressure on overcrowded public prisons and governments. Financed primarily by investors, private prisons basically reduce federal government funding for prisons (Phinney, 1998c, p. 2).
The rise and fall of private prisons being a merchandise to fight against crime is often a reflection from the society's perception of justice and the function with the criminal justice system. Instead of addressing the causes of criminal behavior and rehabilitating the offenders, the criminal justice program is expected to prevent crime via deterrence and elimination on the offenders by locking them up in order to protect the public. However, prisons with their prison subculture only spawn hardened criminals who are ill-prepared for your responsibilities in the true world. Therefore, the construction of prisons via individual firms represents the nightmarish expansion of the criminal justice program that has failed to protect the public by supporting the creation of the safe and peaceful society.
More significantly, local governments that have provided these subsidies have not attempted to determine whether the subsidies have exerted a sure impact over a local prisons (v-vi).
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment