The Puritan Society

It is therefore important to recognize, give tongue to Grisham, that what may well have triggered their crime spree was the position that they saw Stone's film, "a horrific movie that glamorized casual mayhem and blood lust. A movie made with the intent of glorifying ergodic murder"(324).

There is no doubt that Grisham considers Hollywood media moguls to be responsible, at least in part, for much of the military unit that occurs in American conjunction. Indeed, Grisham brought suit against Oliver Stone and his production company, claiming that these agents had some function for the actions of Sarah and Ben (325). Though the suit is yet unresolved, it demonstrates the willingness of Grisham to take action against Hollywood.

conjuration Leo makes the case that in Littleton, Colorado, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris were very likely influenced by violent sidesplitting games when they went on their high school killing spree (330). Leo says that "we are now a society in which the chief form of play for millions of youngsters is making intumescent numbers of people die" (330). Video games are not as some analysts would argue, unharmful fantasies. The very realism that is now likely in video game programming serves, says Leo, to "blur the bourne between fantasy and reality -- guns carefully modeled on real ones, accurate-looking wounds, screams, and other sound effects, even the recoil of a heavy rifle" (331).

Neverthe slight, Rhodes argues that even groups such as the American Me

dical Association, the American psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the National Institute of Mental Health are simply wrong in their endorsement of the belief that media military force has a causal association with actual madness in society (327).

Rhodes asserts that violence is not learned from mock violence and says that there is good causal evidence that violent deportment is learned in personal violent encounters, beginning with the development of children by their parents or their peers (329). Essentially, Rhodes believes that the scientific studies that appear to link violence to mock violence in the media are either methodologically flawed or capable of showing only a correlation between the two variables and not a causal relationship (328).

It is interesting that Rhodes challenges the findings and policies of an assortment of prestigious professional groups such as the American Medical Association and the American Psychological Association, both of which are not likely to have pelt along to judgment on this issue (327). Rhodes offers but a blue number of examples that seem to debunk findings from studies linking violence on telly to violence in society (327). His case is much less compelling than that made by Grisham, whose description of the acts of Sarah and Ben make it top out that these two young peop
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!