How Should Our Society Assign Value To Human Life?

[name][professor][date of submission][course]The Value of LifeSince epoch immemorial , there were m whatsoever attempts to take in the survey of intent . During early times , people were world sold as wives , slaves and other functions . thither was tied(p) a time wherein people had embraced the idea that there is no value to animation at all , particularly during the time of the prevalence of existentialism . In the context of today s world , rough argues that life is now tending(p) value by achievements certification , or the amount of salary one receives . But be these things qualified to be our measure of the value of life ? Or perhaps the more profound inquiry would be : is it even possible to assign value to human lifeOn her article on TIME , entitled What is a Life Worth , Amanda Ripley had argued that the innovational society s attempt to assign a value to life is based on money . The author had presented instances wherein someone dies enchantment on the job , yet the family does non receive some(prenominal) compensation . It was like the family was expecting that someone pay financially for someone s death . Although , insurance and compensation is a popular demeanor of placing financial value to someone s life , it still does not sound right . Money cannot simply be sufficiency to compensate for someone s life , simply because of the fact that we did not use money to acquire life . Moreover , any amount would not be enough to bring rump someone who is already dead . Yet this is the expression companies , the governance , and the families left behind approach death of a soulfulness (RipleyInterestingly , William Shakespeargon , arguably the most influential writer of all time , presents a solution for determining the value of life . by means of the monologue of the regarded best dramatic character of all time , critical point , Shakespeare laid down his argument . Hamlet s soliloquy suggests to us that life is intrinsically full of misfortunes .

The character of Hamlet is contemplating suicide , as he views this as the only way to free himself of life s misfortunes (Hamlet ,Prince of Denmark ,Act III ,Sc .1It seems like both Ripley and Shakespeare are arguing that life can only be given value through death . Moreover , their arguments are focused on the misfortunes of an individual . We know that life is full of misfortunes , and there are still just as more positive points to being aliveBoth pieces are also suggesting that the social status of a person has much to do with the value life . Ripley had explored the question : is there a difference between a poor man and a rich man in terms of the value of life . Shakespeare is also seemingly suggesting the uniform question as his protagonist , Hamlet , is belonging to a high social status - not to mention he is the prince of Denmark . However saddening to think , both authors maybe irrefutably right . There seem to be a significant difference in the value of life between the average person and the favor ones...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper